We Will Not Cave

Here I write to tell you what is going on today in the USA. I do so by showing you the mindset of Mao Tse-Tung and many in the US today. There is absolutely no new information here. Many have already pointed out the lies that we live in and how the Left is manipulating us. The scenario I lay out is based on a reading of Mao Tse-Tung’s work entitled “China’s New Democracy.” This is an exercise in demonstration of, via Mao’s text, just what was happening in the minds of this Chinese leader and his followers. We find in the work on the China’s New Democracy by Mao Tse-Tung the objective of the old type of revolution is to (as Mao puts it) “clear the obstacles in the way of the development of capitalism, yet this kind of revolution is no longer the old type led solely by the bourgeois class and aiming merely at the establishment of a capitalist society or a country under the dictatorship of the bourgeois class ” Mao has more to accomplish with his New Democracy as a result of a revoluti

What a person says about social issues is not controversial, but rather they are political by their very nature.  If “the personal is political,” then anything a person utters is political and hence controversial. Whether one agrees with recent developments around a star’s statement or not, one needn’t even speak it. Implication exists based on one’s appearance, so heck, why not speak-out.  First of all, when one speaks it matters not what one says, but rather w ho or “what” they are, e.g. way to go with your agenda speaking speech, you really stuck your foot in your mouth.  On the other hand, the thought police really nailed you good.  Who is to say that the majority of Americans in this country take one side over the other on these issues? That there is an agenda is obvious.  There is always an agenda, just depends on who you are talking to, “left” or “right” in popular political parlance. “Liberal” and “conservative” have become dirty filthy terms. No matter where one stands on an i

  天下 Mandate of Heaven This is the mandate, that beautiful notion, the perfection of that which is in the historical. What is the difference between mandate of heaven and manifest destiny or divine providence?   It is that which comes about through no metaphysical being, but rather is the resultant in history.   The Zhou were the first to reference 天下 as that which is meant to be when a ruler won a battle. It was, to put it in a way that we can understand the sense, ordained. There was no personage in heaven or willful nature which ordained the result. This is a very difficult concept to portray in Western ideas or language. Just as the heart of perfect wisdom sutra states, “form is emptiness, emptiness is form,” so too the mandate of heaven is a concept of unusual meaning, for the Westerner.   Bottom line, there may be no equivalent in English, but it seems like that it indicates the winner gets to define history. Sound familiar? It is no wonder that, in a world where brute forc

 No matter whether you’re Christian or Jew, no matter whether you’re young or old, no matter whether you're black or white, no matter whether you are American or not, please watch this:  nachba is here today, see the lies that exist within this video . . .  https://www.prageru.com/video/dear-infidels

  So what does the deconstructive method have to do with communism? A lot.   The New Cultrural Movement in China began in 1915 with the introduction of New Youth magazine.   This magazine’s editor was the founder of the CCP, Ch’en Tu-hsiu.   His role was the stirring up of “scholars” (likely pithy idea-tribes)   Many of these so-called scholars were holding diverse points of reference, one thing for sure these academicians had political action in their sights. These scholars have been referred to as “awakened.”   Sound familiar? AND the father of American education, John Dewey, discipled Hu Shih, a very strong figure in the communist movement in China. Nowadays, scholars (call them) work diligently to overturn tradition.   The use of the deconstructive method is quite what these scholars get their bread and butter on. These scholars are working in conjunction with the methods of communism and its push to knock down tradition.   The contributors to the work in and of New Youth (comm

 Aeon Weekly writes: can Society prosper while the planet heals?  This has got to be the most asinine thing I’ve ever heard or read.  The planet, continually regenerates and heals Regardless of what societies do and quite independent of them. Bottom line is, if there were a nuclear holocaust, the roaches would survive in the depths of the Earth   We live on a planet that is continually changing and prospering among its many many many species.  From the Ant to the ape to the human, all is change and change only.   Tired of the whimpering, whining, liberals, and progressive? Run headlong into their stupidity? Do you feel you can’t escape it? We must stand up we will not cave.

In CHINA'S NEW DEMOCRACY by MAO TSE-TUNG one finds language very similar with the rhetoric of the Left, among Democrats in the US in the last 4 years. With the new focus on social justice it never seems one can escape this rhetoric’s influence even in worldwide political landscape.   The words dripping with this rhetoric are very similar to that of Mao Tse-Tung (the Chinese Marxist Stalinist/Leninist) who murdered so many people in his inception of power in China. In the New Democracy Tung stated that “It is the old colonial , semi-colonial and semi-feudal politics, economy and culture that we aim to sweep away, and it is new politics, economy and culture, something exactly opposite to the old, that we are going to establish” This is in direct connection with those who would destroy in the name of building for the better(ment) of the US and the world.   Tung goes on to exclaim “The democracy mentioned here is not the old democracy of the old type, but the New Democracy of the new

The term tribe or tribalism has most frequently been use among scholars and politicians, of late.   Though the term has a multifarious history and usage, It has been abused and misused by many up to today.   “ Fried contends that the term is so ambiguous and confusing that it should be abandoned by social scientists ” (Pennsylvania University African Center) The bottom line for me is that the use of the term does not matter. Regardless of the use of the term,   the idea that there is a   system which definitively works to designate one group as opposed to another is fallacious. People identify in many ways with a term, democrat, and republican, black, white; these terms are more than descriptive, they lend a flavor to language that remains in the mind much longer than perhaps one would want them to.   With a simple search one finds the following definition. “Tribalism in a political sense refers to the strong political solidarity typical of post-truth politics” Tribe, more so tribalism