Same Old Story, Labelled New Democracy
Here I write to tell you what is going on today in the USA. I do so by showing you the mindset of Mao Tse-Tung and many in the US today. There is absolutely no new information here. Many have already pointed out the lies that we live in and how the Left is manipulating us. The scenario I lay out is based on a reading of Mao Tse-Tung’s work entitled “China’s New Democracy.” This is an exercise in demonstration of, via Mao’s text, just what was happening in the minds of this Chinese leader and his followers.
We find in
the work on the China’s New Democracy by Mao Tse-Tung the objective of the old
type of revolution is to (as Mao puts it) “clear the obstacles in the way of
the development of capitalism, yet this kind of revolution is no longer the old
type led solely by the bourgeois class and aiming
merely at the establishment of a capitalist society or a country under the dictatorship of the bourgeois
class” Mao has more to accomplish with his New Democracy as a result
of a revolution being a fair society, fair for all or inclusive of all
class. Mao states that “a new type (of
revolution) led wholly or partially by the proletariat and aiming at the
establishment of a New-Democratic
society” (italics added) Because of the intensive nature of the language here
and the understanding that more than one discursive thread can run throughout
Mao Tse-Tung’s iteration about the two types of revolutions, the old and the
new, becomes clouded in meaning. The first type of revolution he understands is
the bourgeois type (the old type) which ends in a “bourgeois dictatorship.”
Those at the top of leadership and the “dictators” (as Mao would have it) have hegemony
wrapped-up. This “old type” of revolutionary ideology put the bourgeoisie in
control of all the effective mechanisms in society. According to Mao the “new type” (New Democracy) of revolutionary activity
puts emphasis on the proletariat winning the day. As we know the dictatorship
is settled in the end by the authoritarian leader (in this case, for China, Mao
himself). Mao’s language indicates a New Democracy which has power directed by
the people, but this is not the case, as Mao expresses: “This kind of
revolution is a great blow to imperialism, and therefore is not permitted but
opposed by the imperialists. On the other hand, it is permitted by socialism, and is assisted by the Socialist state and
the international socialist proletariat.” Here Mao cryptically explains that
the “imperialists” dislike the revolution which leads to the “New Democracy.”
The order Mao talks about is supported by socialists, Mao is makes it quite clear. The “New Democracy” is in fact not a
democracy, but rather a socialist system of governing. In the parlance of today’s
revolutionary movement democracy = socialism.
This is very clearly demonstrated by the purely agenda driven
perspective of American politics. The agenda is socialist, not democracy, there
is a difference. The use of words to manipulate
swathes of the world’s population in favor of “democracy,” which is really
socialism, is in full-mode. This
communist tactic has in its favor the media, part of the church, the academy,
and well known well intending individuals and groups. This road leads to
socialism, the “s” word, that word which has typically been treated as a bad-word
is no longer such, this is the goal.
Once that is met, the move is to have power fall into the hands of an
authoritarian dictator. Mr. President
becomes the dictator; in the Communist Era it was Stalin or Mao. In the present
state of affairs the “leader” is illustrative and well-known, this is in the
making, and we must not allow it to happen. Do not cave!!! The byword for those who wish to seize more
power is “democracy,” but what is really meant by that word is “socialism.” You
are on the cusp of a new understanding of governing in our world. Yes means no, up is down, words do not
indicate the sameness of property but rather opposites.
All thsat
said I am sure a few American leaders come to mind. this is a old message with a timely meaning.
The reality of socialism and totalitarian (not of some “soft” totalitarianism) are
looking the US in the face. (call it conspiracy
theory if you wish).
Comments