Mandate of Heaven . . . . (it's all the same)
天下 Mandate of Heaven
This is the mandate, that
beautiful notion, the perfection of that which is in the historical. What is
the difference between mandate of heaven and manifest destiny or divine
providence? It is that which comes about
through no metaphysical being, but rather is the resultant in history. The Zhou were the first to reference 天下 as that which is meant to be when a ruler won a battle. It
was, to put it in a way that we can understand the sense, ordained. There was
no personage in heaven or willful nature which ordained the result. This is a
very difficult concept to portray in Western ideas or language. Just as the
heart of perfect wisdom sutra states, “form is emptiness, emptiness is form,” so
too the mandate of heaven is a concept of unusual meaning, for the
Westerner. Bottom line, there may be no
equivalent in English, but it seems like that it indicates the winner gets to
define history. Sound familiar?
It is no wonder that, in a world where brute force
wins the day, each winner gets the honor the privilege to be the king of the
hill and the definer of everyone else’s reality. These ideas revolve around one
thing, POWER! This can be duly noted without the help of
dialectic. Each understanding of why things are the way they are is inferior to
the process that gets us there.
Providence, manifest destiny, mandate of heaven are
all the same, men’s justification for making
history what at it is . . . .
Comments