CRT and me

Sarah A. Radcliffe once wrote “Postcolonial approaches have attuned geographers to the politics of giving voice to postcolonial subjects, and the intricate emotive histories that can be both challenged and brought into post-colonial nation-building”  The challenging of these emotive histories happens when the work of Howard Zinn, which presents the histories of the people, about the formation of the US, is challenged.  Certainly alternate stories are necessary in order to help us have a balanced understanding about history.  When such stories and histories conflict this brings-up again old unrest and rivalries that were sure fired guaranteed wins for the whites in the day. Like Zinn, postcolonial and anti-colonial writers do more than theorize, they present us with what we should consider valuable and see them as more than just renditions of history.  All of the argumentation against critical race theory sits well in a church classroom full of white folk, but can come to blows in school board meetings. Koheleth, the speaker of the words in Ecclesiastes once wrote of the necessity of understanding both sides of a story.  History is a collection of stories, and when treated amiably by those on either side there can be growth. The utility of the deconstructive method is evident, when not pushing both sides of a dichotomous world against each other. Radcliffe also wrote about the “therapeutic role of postcolonial theory and the lack of closure around a straightforwardly post-colonial moment” What is needed among white church-goers is some study into the movements that have called forth the postcolonial moment, instead of theorizing about how this or that theory is wrong. Such bullheadedness makes enemies and reinforces misconceptions, perhaps even perpetuating strong discord. No matter how winsome one is with apologetic, it seems an unlikely winner to be those who think they have summarily defeated their enemy, but not left room for the other to speak.  Taking the world back does not include canceling, otherizing, or de-legitimizing anyone. Some scholars have a lot to say about CRT (and CRGT) and who are bigheads and bigwigs sound flowery when defending the “faith” but often delimit the experience of some, if not a lot, of people of color.  There has got to be a better way ahead. We will not cave and shall better heads prevail.  If calmer more level heads do not prevail the church will lose more generations, because Christianity is depicted in such seditious ways, by so many educators.  Let's be prayerful about the way awakening sweeps the country and the world, so as to include many into the Kingdom of God.                     

Comments

Anonymous said…
Critical theory and it's offspring CRT (which essentially replaces the "proletariat" with race) is the creature that it is. One of many contending ideas in the marketplace of ideas. Let's pray that the Church (the ecclesia) can rise above the current fray recognizing its place of being "in the world, not of the world." The Church can do its work of preaching the Gospel to every creature without the need to legitimize or delegitimize the economic/political notions that inevitably wander about the human thought-scape, but declare the Truth which, as a wise man once said, is the thing that will set us free.
Marketplace of ideas and human thought-scape are spaces where religion and the ekklesia roam themselves. Everything is thoughtworld including the Gospel. It is all embedded in language, which is the very thing which Jesus Christ used to tackle his foes, the active logos of God. A more than minor point here, Jesus Christ is more than a wise man, granted though I understand you know better and that you were speaking tongue-in-cheek. In the thoughtscape, thoughtworld, marketplace of ideas we find the Gospel, that stumbling block to those who would mistake it for just another idea. It is important to keep the Gospel in the marketplace and in politics. In order for there to be an engagement with the world and the heavenly, one cannot hide (a la Dreher), but must enter the world with the Gospel. One needs to bring the Gospel to the marketplace, or as Bhabha says “the bazaar.” The Gospel is more than some ethereal notion or freefloating set of ideas or just that Jesus died for our sin and the resurrection and the ascension. The Gospel is that which has Living Power within the world or marketplace of ideas. The Gospel is in the molecule of water. The Gospel is in the rock that Jesus would have turned into bread. The Gospel is in the wine on the communion table. The Gospel is in the political, this is where we live . . . like it or not we are a part of the polis. BTW the water molecule reference made here is not some new age notion or pantheistic musing. The Gospel within the world of politics will weather the storm and does not need our protection. God can kick political leaders in the rear just as Haman was hanged and Mordecai was given the king’s signet ring to so the Jews could arise. Hallelu, God wins the day.
Keep it coming . . . .
Anonymous said…
we need to cut out our dichotomous thinking about a holy realm versus a earthly. God is in this world, God made this world, will destroy and create.

Popular posts from this blog

Let's spread MISINFORMATION

21st century prophecies

Dirty words