Gurminder K
Bhambra and John Holmwood state that “Many recent accounts of the welfare state
in Europe (and, elsewhere) suggest that changing patterns of immigration have
undermined the solidarity necessary to recognise the claims of fellow citizens
to social rights” AND although “there is a failure of solidarity, we argue that
it is one that has its origins in colonialism which organised access to
politics and social rights on a hierarchical and racialised basis” Since the
social rights of citizens and non-citizens has altered the face of social aid
in the US it seems likely that such aid will expand and include migrants that
are not citizens. An interesting use of the term “social rights” here suggests
that individuals have rights to access to aid.
As far as rights are concerned, conservatives would argue that the only
rights individuals have should be designated for legal citizens. It seems almost
a guarantee at tis point that not mtter how one enters the US that those people
would be considered by the radicalized Left to have social rights, spken of as
baic human rights. The catch is how far
the US is going to go in fulfilling the needs of people that are in the US
illegally.
The language
used by Bhambra and Holmwood suggests that these human rights have been denied
people due to a “colonial” “hierarchy” and based on a racialised basis.” This language
proves that its use is intentional in educating the readers as to the nature of
the denial of social rights (whether tendered legally or illegally) being
rooted in colonialism. This evidences the way that the didactic process of
retraining the Western mind to the mindset of “guilt” is engendered. This is a political move that the Left uses
and is quite effective. In order to get
policies instituted the use of such language informing the legislators is of
the nature of causing the policies to be rather Marxist, which is not
particularly in line with postcolonial ends. This use of language, because language
so defines reality, is detrimental to democracy and the will of the people who
are citizens of the US. The claims about racialisation will addressed I future
posts.
Comments