On religion, not by Nietzsche

What is a hypomensch ??? one that would consider themselves as the representation of the lowest of humans in all sorts of ways.  Hypo meaning below and mensch meaning person.  The lowest of all creatures the least in any way, not deserving even of being the lowest in glory, but to be without any recognition by others.  This person is the lowest of all, the super-hypo-person whose lowliness is equivalent with dung.  Who is hypomensch, not the one who would ascribe to the first will be last and the last will be first, because that would imply hypomensch to be deserving of some recognition, in the Kingdom of God. What if hypomensch claimed to be God? How crazy that would be, but what if hypomensch were proclaimed to be God by others?  That is crazy yet, as well.  Let’s imagine for a moment that one of us is hypomensch.  That person would be subject to scorn and laughable disdain. But, that person would own the scorn and disdain. Isn’t that agreement by the person “to be hypomensch” and to “accept and own scorn and disdain”?  Hypomensch is not even able to be compared to ubermensch, because that would imply a hierarchy whichhyppomensch would not be capable of participating in. Hypomensch is so utterly blameful that even rats and flies would by reluctant and unable to sustain in their presence. Hypomensch would not be lauded with the lowliest or lifted or promoted (demoted) to the lowest of all places; there is no place for them, even to be considered to be a person. Hypomensch is to be in no way lauded. Are we hypomensch? No, not at all.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let's spread MISINFORMATION

According to the government 2  + 2 = 5  and Math is racist. Let’s spread the Truth, which is misinformation.  Let’s spread misinformation all over the place, in every household, community, city, state, and nation(s).  We will not cave on the matter of Truth, no matter how much they say 2 + 2 = 5. No matter what the Party tried to press upon the mind of Winston Smith (in George Orwell’s “1984”), Smith would not succumb, until the end.  For us we will not succumb to the lies, i.e. truth is lies; math is injustice; truth is unjust and other opposites that are flipped on their heads, and are made into the real lies that they are feeding the world.  The Left is relentlessly programming young children, to young adults, to you. Media process has you under its spell.  Stop watching TV and movies, please.  You will find only lies there.  So let’s spread misinformation, while the government is calling truth to be lies. Government and media are vacuous ...
Read more

21st century prophecies

In 21 Lessons for the 21 st Century , the GREAT prophet spoke, saying mockingly, “After all, we are God’s nation, so the argument goes, so what’s good for our nation is pleasing to God.  There certainly are religious sages who reject nationalist excesses and adopt far more universal visions. Unfortunately, such sages don’t wield much political power these days” uttering the excellent, profound, and provocative words, “the handmaid of nationalism is religion” as well, “Religions, rites, and rituals will remain important as long as the power of humankind rests on mass cooperation and as long as mass cooperation rests on belief in shared fiction” and “past experiences of the whole of humanity, will become less reliable guides” “The Zionist story fails to ascribe any meaning to Chinese Empires, to the tribes of New Guinea, and to the Andromeda galaxy, as well as to the countless eons that passed before the existence of Moses, Abraham, and the evolution of the apes” and “eternity is at...
Read more

Consider if you will . . . . . . .

Have you wondered why the Left wants to rid us of one nation under God?  It is not only God they want to eliminate; they intend to destroy the idea of “nation.” This is done through praise of everything but nation.  Homi K Bhabha, in The Location of Culture says that he is not challenging only nationalism, but the historical certainty he wishes to distort and destroy, as well. So Bhabha praise immigrant as migrant and criminal as statistic. The criminal is seen as one who awaits release into the nation. Bhabha writes, “I have lived that moment of the scattering of the people that in other times and other places, in the nations of others, becomes a time of gathering. Gatherings of exiles and emigres and refugees; gathering on the edge of 'foreign' cultures . . . the gathering of people in the diaspora: indentured, migrant, interned; the gathering of incriminatory statistics”  “nation fills the void left by the uprooting of communities and kin”  If you want to get a f...
Read more