Environmental Person-ities
THEY have a stranglehold on your children, whether your
children are in k-5 or in college or graduate school. It is not about pride month, it is about kids
teaching kids. THEY have had the ball
rolling for decades. Those who teach your
children are children themselves. Those with prestigious degrees go straight
through college and into graduate school.
Those who teach in the new guard of educators, just barely got their
educations. (don’t start whining about
my use of they and those) Teachers trained in the liberal arts or humanities
are learning about the science -society nexus or the science-society interface
as the focus of learning. Kindly tell me
what science is these days, propaganda.
As for society, it is morally bankrupt.
What a mixed bag, paper bag that is, and it is all wet. The arguments
that are used to justify scientific principles demonstrate the constructed nature
of knowledge (constructed, a la Thomas Kuhn, Jacques Derrida, and Michel
Foucault). Each theory (or fact they would
have you believe) is based on faulty thinking, or fallacious logic, if
any. If there is a disdain for “reason”
(i.e. logocentrism) it surely can be deconstructed or dismantled. Things only fall within reason for these kids
teaching kids if these things filter through the sieve of the grand institution
of academia. The academy and its flaming
progressive government, entertainment, and popular cohorts is pushing
environmental humanities. If someone you know has a liberal arts degree, or
even a bachelor of science degree, they are of the same bent. Their conviction is one that entangles them
in the so-called science-society nexus or science-society interface, problem
still is: what the heck amounts to science these days. Right back to the ever
self defining environmental (anti) humanities!
If you ask me you have to take the human out of the equation, as well. What
is left is environmental person-ities. What a floppy straw-man (sic).
Comments