Qualitative, right

Nikita Carney writes an article that “consists of a qualitative textual analysis of a selection of Twitter posts” This is the academic equivalent of hocus-pocus and pulling the rabbit (white btw) out of a hat or finding what the researcher is out to prove.  The answer is in the question; the academician sets out to find what they are looking for in this type of so-called research. Qualitative research is based on no science; it is not what the science says (as though the science says it means anything anymore anyway). One thinks they are getting something special with discourse analyses, but one is really getting to a matter from the perspective the researcher brings to it. Carney admits to using “sociological theories and tools” this is a soft science, better to be known as fake science.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let's spread MISINFORMATION

21st century prophecies

Dirty words