UN or not

 In its section dealing with “climate change and human rights” Analysing Intersections between Climate Change and Human Rights reports compiled by Daniel Uribe Teran and Luis Fernando Rosales establish that “all countries recognise the need to take action” and “the world will overshoot the 1.5°C threshold in 20 years or less” and “This means more frequent droughts, flooding, heatwaves and other extreme weather effects affecting most regions of the world, particularly the most vulnerable people”  The fact is that organizations that form committees and councils are not the actual countries themselves which they represent. The world that will overshoot some threshold (measured and monitored and decided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) of 1.5 degrees Celsius is what will cause the earth to be uninhabitable.  If things weigh in the balance, why do not all people in the prominent countries agree on the danger and the Celsius measure given by the IPCC? (the IPCC made of deciders [meaning makers] like the American Convention on Human Rights, which includes Latin American, Caribbean, Southeast  Asian, and European countries represented through councils). It comes down to who one believes and the alleged credibility of the UN and its work on “climate change” (once called Global Warming, why it is not called this is beyond explanation).  Councils can be formed and decide on what is legitimate science, making broad, sweeping statements that the liberals and progressives follow them down their path of beliefs.  People in all parts of the world rely on UN News to understand what appropriate science is and share in the UN’s unanimous ideas about the earth.  Why should one agree with a council that is formed by the UN? Who says that their science is accurate or their premises realistic? Even Michel Foucault discussed knowledge power palpability, as knowledge is decided on and distributed by entities and authorities.                                                             

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let's spread MISINFORMATION

According to the government 2  + 2 = 5  and Math is racist. Let’s spread the Truth, which is misinformation.  Let’s spread misinformation all over the place, in every household, community, city, state, and nation(s).  We will not cave on the matter of Truth, no matter how much they say 2 + 2 = 5. No matter what the Party tried to press upon the mind of Winston Smith (in George Orwell’s “1984”), Smith would not succumb, until the end.  For us we will not succumb to the lies, i.e. truth is lies; math is injustice; truth is unjust and other opposites that are flipped on their heads, and are made into the real lies that they are feeding the world.  The Left is relentlessly programming young children, to young adults, to you. Media process has you under its spell.  Stop watching TV and movies, please.  You will find only lies there.  So let’s spread misinformation, while the government is calling truth to be lies. Government and media are vacuous ...
Read more

21st century prophecies

In 21 Lessons for the 21 st Century , the GREAT prophet spoke, saying mockingly, “After all, we are God’s nation, so the argument goes, so what’s good for our nation is pleasing to God.  There certainly are religious sages who reject nationalist excesses and adopt far more universal visions. Unfortunately, such sages don’t wield much political power these days” uttering the excellent, profound, and provocative words, “the handmaid of nationalism is religion” as well, “Religions, rites, and rituals will remain important as long as the power of humankind rests on mass cooperation and as long as mass cooperation rests on belief in shared fiction” and “past experiences of the whole of humanity, will become less reliable guides” “The Zionist story fails to ascribe any meaning to Chinese Empires, to the tribes of New Guinea, and to the Andromeda galaxy, as well as to the countless eons that passed before the existence of Moses, Abraham, and the evolution of the apes” and “eternity is at...
Read more

Dirty words

  “Conservative” and “liberal” have been words that have incited arguments (not necessarily fighting) in the 20 th century.   In recent times the word “conservative” has become a dirty/filthy word.   It has indicated “hate” “Hate-speech” “unlovingness” and derogatory terms attributed to it. Conservatives have become the dregs of society, as Hillary Clinton most popularly named them “the deplorables” Another dirty word “Christian” has entered the dictionary of filth.   Are you sick of it?    Some say God is going to rectify this whole cultural mess, others (like me) think that there is too much invisible power invested in taking the West down, as evident in politics and those who feed politicians the sustaining coercive philosophy that will drive Christians into small groups that meet in homes, the Left is powering up for the take-down. Stand firm always and wait to see the salvation of the Lord Adonai More later on words that when given capital letters...
Read more