th arm of global governance
There are certain terms which progressives equivocate: example of this project would be “nation = Empire” or “difference = other” (in some negative light) or “Christianity = hegemony” (the powerful). These equals are not the things that THEY say are “MEAN or oppressive” These equivocations are based on lies about our culture and unfounded concerns. Presently, to say that Christianity is a powerful force in the world is bogus and a lie. Visit any place of learning and see how Christianity is taught and the inaccuracies about Christianity that are rammed down children’s throats. We will take a closer look at how “nation” is torn apart.
In From Colonialism to International Aid it is explained that “Transnational approaches
to social policy have been described as a “means of revealing the constructed
parameters of the ‘national’” As jd ripper exposes in Words on the Street: Postcolonialsm and Public Policy “nation” and
“national” have been words critiqued and
deconstructed by the Left in a fashion that destroys boundaries and the effects
they have on social policy. The World Economic
Forum is working to see the governance of nations dissolved and that there be one
world order. Get a load of this preposition, “transnational law can address (emphasis added) a range of
public and private actors, including states, intergovernmental organizations,
international and national non-governmental organizations, civil society
organizations and families” These are some frightening words on the levels of
concern for these Leftist. See further, “Since the beginning of the
twenty-first century, there has been a rapid rise in social protection
initiatives in many low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) that can be mainly
attributed to a growing number of social assistance programs” Is it possible to
feed every person in the world while controlling their very existence? Can the
US save the world by spending hundreds of billion dollars? Here is another
example, The Colonial Legacy and the Rise of Social Assistance in the Global South, that in
the 21st century, “There has . . . been a global surge in
public social spending . . . . we argue that social unrest is a key ‘political’
factor that drives this expansion, translating ‘structural’ pressures into
social expenditures” As in their effort to control the public sphere
progressives are attempting to control private lives. The far-reaching arm of
globalization and progressive ideology has invaded your life; if you don’t see
it happening, you may need to take a closer look at what you are exposed to
every day. Remember, as Stuart Hall put
it, “representation is reality.”
Comments