Forgive and forget??? NO WAY
According to Nir Eisikovits “tensions between peace and justice (are) typical of transitional settings” This is the typical state of affairs after periods of unrest or war in regions of the world. My intuition is that postcolonial philosophy would consider this “tension” as a result of the iterations of slavery and racial hierarchy. The invention of race, a colonial event, was a process that worked its way into our parlance and consideration over time. Colonizers label people as barbaric, uncivilized, and primitive, who differ from them.
Nir Eisikovits speaks of this recipe “In consolidated democracies, such tensions
can be alleviated by legal institutions and traditions that embody conclusions
about how to manage the requisite tradeoffs between justice and social utility
(these include a constitution, a body of accepted constitutional jurisprudence,
a respected high court with powers of judicial review, etc.) AND “the very
point of the transitional period is to set up the institutions and methods
responsible for having that debate” This
type of policy making will not fly on the streets. Even Nir Eisikovits admits that “the need to
attract foreign investors and maintain peace in the streets may require some
compromises on the extent and length of criminal proceedings against past
perpetrators, and so forth” The whole idea of the tension is that it is there
and is not going away, as long a certain people see their past as indicative of
their present and future, then the cycle of violence and retribution will
continue.
As bazaar as it may seem there
are some consideration in justice and peace; there is the act of “forgetting as
a response to mass atrocity” and the “importance of forgiveness in politics. AND
Forgiveness is said to be the only disposition that allows us to break free of
the endless cycle of blow and counter blow characteristic of ethnic conflict” “We have seen this inability to forgive, much
less forget AND “political forgiveness concerns its potential to release
victims and wrongdoers from the effects of vindictiveness. A desire for revenge
can generate a never-ending violent cycle”
The problem with all of this is that sides of a discourse are not going
to forgive atrocities, much less forget them. Nir Eisikovits can speculate
about these political strategies, the Words on the Street, see book by that
same name by jd ripper, are not going to let go of heinous and atrocious
behaviors and happenings.
Comments